[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debian-NYC] Workshop #2: using what we've learned

Sorry I missed the first one, sounds like it was alot of fun!
I can offer my office space -- as long as I am present.  We're
conveniently located near Penn Station and have two conference rooms;
the larger holds about 15, the smaller 6-8.


On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 09:45:55AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> We had our first workshop nearly two weeks ago, and I have not yet
> followed up.  This email is about scheduling a follow up.  Please see
> this poll for date options:
>   http://doodle.com/ezt48vr4c5kbab6p
> What will this workshop be about?  It will be much more free form, not
> as lecture-based as the last one.  We can do the "everyone fixes some
> bugs" that we didn't get to last time, but there could also be groups
> discussing: backporting, looking at a package and identify all the
> parts, looking at a poorly-done package, advanced tools, ... .  If you
> have any suggestions/requests, please follow up to this email.
> This workshop follows up the first one, but you by no means have to
> have been to the first to come to the second.  There will probably be
> a group which reviews of the things we learned at the first one.
> Depending on the location, there may be a reservation limit again
> here.  If you fill out the poll, you'll be considered RSVPed if you
> choose to confirm, but it's not limited to people who fill out the
> poll.
> - Richard
> (I'm hoping for Nov 6th or 7th because our visitor from europe can
> attend, which will help in our goal of taking over the world and
> such)
> -- 
> | Richard Darst  -  rkd@          -  boltzmann: up 101 days, 10:33
> |            http://rkd.zgib.net  -  pgp 0xBD356740
> | "Ye shall know the truth and -- the truth shall make you free"
> _______________________________________________
> DebianNYC mailing list
> DebianNYC@vireo.org
> http://lists.vireo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debiannyc
DebianNYC mailing list

Reply to: