Am 03.07.2010 08:14, schrieb Guillem Jover:
Hi,On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 14:42:44 +0200, Daniel Bock wrote:Am 02.07.2010 13:43, schrieb Guillem Jover:I might have missed something but isn't: $ dpkg --force-confmiss --force-confnew -i foo.deb what you are looking for (given the patch you've sent)? (Regardless of the prospective dpkg-conffile support etc).No, it's definitely not. --force-confmiss --force-confnew are just for file conflicts, which are not handled automatically. Edit your /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf and try your command. It won't be replaced.Ah! Ok, so it seems I missread your mail. Yes, this was already filed as bug #102609, for which Henning Makholm had provided a really simple patch, that I've now merged (after little shoehorning into the current code). It adds a new --force-confask, which can optionally be combined with either --force-confnew and --force-confmiss: <http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=bd0ae9a4> And the new functional test for it: <http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/pkg-tests.git;a=commitdiff;h=e980657b> regards, guillem No, it can be combined with either --force-confnew and --force-confold. Sorry for my irritating e-mail. regards, Daniel Bock |