Re: Next upload 2007-05-03 (dpkg 1.14.0)

[Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>]

Guillem Jover writes ("Re: Next upload 2007-05-03 (dpkg 1.14.0)"):
> With 1.13.25 u-a:
...
>   0

I think there's an argument that some of these are more correct.

In particular, you don't want something like
>   pulsar:~# update-alternatives --auto foo; echo $?
to fail just because it happens between update-alternatives --install
and --remove.

>   pulsar:~# update-alternatives --remove foo /bin/foo; echo $?
>   0

And ought to be idempotent so it shouldn't fail the second time.

etc.

Ian.