[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg branches



On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 09:11 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:

> > You can either create new branches:
> > 
> > 	tla tag -S scott@netsplit.com/dpkg--devel--1.13 dpkg--devel--1.13
> > 	tla tag -S scott@netsplit.com/dpkg--stable--1.10 dpkg--stable-1.10
> 
> I may be wrong, but shouldn't this be
> scott@netsplit.com--2004/blahblah ?
> 
Yes, well caught :o)

> When new l10n fixes will come up, I'll probably commit them to both
> branches unless they only apply to one....this will be a case by case
> choice : I'll mention where I finally commit the po files when tagging
> the relevant bug reports.
> 
*nods* I generally plan to mostly commit to devel, and backport anything
important to stable -- in other words, stable should remain really
stable.  This is pretty consistent with the fact it's hard to get things
into stable anyway.

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: