[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg branches

On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 09:11 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:

> > You can either create new branches:
> > 
> > 	tla tag -S scott@netsplit.com/dpkg--devel--1.13 dpkg--devel--1.13
> > 	tla tag -S scott@netsplit.com/dpkg--stable--1.10 dpkg--stable-1.10
> I may be wrong, but shouldn't this be
> scott@netsplit.com--2004/blahblah ?
Yes, well caught :o)

> When new l10n fixes will come up, I'll probably commit them to both
> branches unless they only apply to one....this will be a case by case
> choice : I'll mention where I finally commit the po files when tagging
> the relevant bug reports.
*nods* I generally plan to mostly commit to devel, and backport anything
important to stable -- in other words, stable should remain really
stable.  This is pretty consistent with the fact it's hard to get things
into stable anyway.

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: