Bug#171489: dpkg: and update the translations
El mar, 27-04-2004 a las 17:48, Scott James Remnant escribió:
> On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 17:06 +0200, Ruben Porras wrote:
> > while you are on it, maybe you should update the spanish translations and
> > include dpkg-scansources.8 (please, see the Full Text of the message wich
> > reopened this bug this time and the previous one)
> This is why you should submit new bugs for new translations, instead of
> reopening old ones! It isn't at *all* clear what's missing right now.
> Could you take five minutes to check the Spanish translation (es.po)
sorry, I can't help with this.
> *and* manpages (in man/es) in the 1.10.21 SOURCE PACKAGE and open a new
> bug for any missing or outdated translations attaching a complete copy
> of the replacement file.
as you requested:
#246164, #246163, #246162, #246161, #246160, #246159 and #246158
I hope this make clear what exactly is missing.
> As far as I can tell, the history of #171489 goes like this:
> 2-Dec-2002, firstname.lastname@example.org
> New spanish manpages available
> 9-Jun-2003, email@example.com
> "Some other" manpages available (no list or description)
> 25-Oct-2003, firstname.lastname@example.org
> dpkg 1.10.16 released, closing the bug.
You miss this:
Bug reopened, if you read _all_ this message you'll discover that it
inform about the problem in debian/rules and about dpkg-scansources.pod
> 19-Mar-2004, email@example.com
> Bug reopened
The bug was reopened several months ago.
> to inform developers that there is a new
> dpkg-source.1 page available.
> THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN A NEW BUG.
ok, I admit it was probably wrong, I thought this way will be easier to
> 25-Apr-2004, firstname.lastname@example.org
> dpkg 1.10.21 released, closing the bug.
> There is no message saying that 1.10.16 was missing any translations,
> there is no message saying that 1.10.21 is missing any translations.
The message is in the mail reopening the bug, I did as Esteban did
before, supposing he knows what he was doing, if this method of
reopening bugs and including the reason in the same mail is wrong (it
seems that it caused the misunderstanding), please, let me know.
> There was a bug in the debian/rules file that meant the translations are
> only included in the source package -- and not the binary package. That
> will be fixed in 1.10.22.