[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#235266: dpkg-dev: dpkg-checkbuilddeps should distinguish build-depends from build-conflicts



On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 09:00:40PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> How irritating; what would a better wording be?

I'd suggest "Unsatisfied build dependencies" and "Unsatisfied build
conflicts."  It doesn't cover the singular/plural mismatch, but neither
does the current wording, and the script shouldn't introduce such a
silly obstacle to machine-parsability.

"Unsatisfied build dependencies (Build-Depends):" or "Unsatisfied build
dependencies (Build-Conflicts):" would be okay for the translators
sake.  "Unmet" would do as well.

-- 
Devin  \ aqua(at)devin.com, 1024D/E9ABFCD2;  http://www.devin.com
Carraway \ IRC: Requiem  GCS/CC/L s-:--- !a !tv C++++$ ULB+++$ O+@ P L+++

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: