On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 09:50, Devin Carraway wrote: > dpkg-checkbuilddeps, if run in a build with a Build-Conflicts on an > installed package, the conflict will simply be reported as "Unmed build > dependencies: packagename." One can't tell that apart from an > unsatisfied Build-Depends, which leads to some small confusion. > How irritating; what would a better wording be? "Unmet build dependencies (conflicts): packagename" That'd certainly be easier from a translator point of view... or perhaps something more like: "Unusable build dependencies: packagename" Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part