[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg and debhelper patches for lib64 support

Adam Heath wrote:
> No to ${field}, ${field}32, ${field}64.  Yes to ${field}[.${variant}].
> This allows for completely abstract package field variants, and targets.
> It's not hard-coded to 32/64, and can be extended for athlon, ppc64, sse,
> whatever.

Could you write out an example?

see shy jo

Attachment: pgpGphUS3I9Uz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: