Adam Heath wrote:
> No to ${field}, ${field}32, ${field}64. Yes to ${field}[.${variant}].
>
> This allows for completely abstract package field variants, and targets.
> It's not hard-coded to 32/64, and can be extended for athlon, ppc64, sse,
> whatever.
Could you write out an example?
--
see shy jo
Attachment:
pgplrmcdhfTgn.pgp
Description: PGP signature