[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [patch] brazilian portuguese (pt_BR) dpkg's pt_BR.po update



On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 08:42:50PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
> > Cold someone take a look at it and apply if it's valid ?
> 
> This bit from the beginning of the patch looks a bit weird:
> 
> +msgid ""
> +"couldn't allocate memory for strdup in findpackage(%s)no fo possvel alocar "
> +"memria para strdup em findpackage(%s)size %7d occurs %5d times\n"
> 
> Otherwise it looks fine so I'll commit it to CVS.

Hmm, really weird. I know, I see you alreay commited. Anyway, I think
the following patch will fix that weirdness.

Sorry for not sending it earlier, but I was out of the city these days.

Index: po/pt_BR.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/dpkg/dpkg/po/pt_BR.po,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 pt_BR.po
--- po/pt_BR.po	2002/02/03 19:46:22	1.9
+++ po/pt_BR.po	2002/02/06 23:00:59
@@ -59,11 +59,14 @@
 
 #: lib/database.c:177
 #, c-format
+msgid ""
+"couldn't allocate memory for strdup in findpackage(%s)"
+msgstr ""
+"não foi possível alocar memória para strdup in findpackage(%s)"
+
 #: lib/database.c:247
 #, c-format
-msgid ""
-"couldn't allocate memory for strdup in findpackage(%s)não fo possível alocar "
-"memória para strdup em findpackage(%s)size %7d occurs %5d times\n"
+msgid "size %7d occurs %5d times\n"
 msgstr "tamanho %7d ocorre %5d vezes\n"
 
 #: lib/database.c:248


-- 
++----------------------------------------------------------------------++
||  Andre Luis Lopes                   andrelop@ig.com.br               ||
||  Debian-BR Project                  http://debian-br.cipsga.org.br   ||
||  Personal Web Site                  http://www.utah.com.br/~andrelop ||      
||  Public GPG KeyID                   9D1B82F6                         ||
||  Keyserver                          wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net               ||

Attachment: pgpw7KY6o8Ef9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: