[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Release Notes for buster: 70-persistent-net-rules still supported?



On Mi, 10 iul 19, 22:21:59, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>  
> > To be on the safe side the entry could be adjusted as per this patch 
> > (also attached for convenience):
> 
> I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve with this change, since all
> it seems to do is assert more specifically that the thing you've got a
> confirmed report of typically doesn't happen, which is what we were
> all assuming anyway.

As per above "to be on the safe side", but maybe I'm too cautious :)

> Would it help if instead of saying "only one network interface (of a
> given type)" it said something like "only one network interface in a
> given type namespace (e.g. ethX)"?

From my translator's point of view, please avoid the jargon 
("namespace"), though I can't come up with something better...

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: