[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Release Notes for buster: 70-persistent-net-rules still supported?



Am 03.07.19 um 18:52 schrieb andreimpopescu@gmail.com:
> On Mi, 03 iul 19, 18:22:30, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 03.07.19 um 17:53 schrieb andreimpopescu@gmail.com:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/en/issues.dbk b/en/issues.dbk
>>> index 4769f9d6..c7634151 100644
>>> --- a/en/issues.dbk
>>> +++ b/en/issues.dbk
>>> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ information mentioned in <xref linkend="morereading"/>.
>>>       the old-style network interface names that were deprecated with
>>>       stretch (such as <literal>eth0</literal> or <literal>wlan0</literal>),
>>>       you should be aware that <systemitem role="package">udev</systemitem>
>>> -     in buster no longer supports the mechanism of defining their names via
>>> +     in buster does not reliably support the mechanism of defining their names via
>>
>> I'd prefer if we rephrased that and declared the old naming scheme as
>> officially unsupported in buster.
> 
> As per the e-mail thread that started this, users will find out it does 
> work. If the Release Notes entry contradicts their experience they will 
> dismiss the advice as outdated/incorrect/etc.

Being a supported configuration and still working (to some extent) are
two different issues, I'd say.


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: