Your message dated Fri, 17 Apr 2015 08:54:50 +0200 with message-id <5530AE3A.3030104@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#782404: release-notes: re-proofreading has caused the Debian Bug report #782404, regarding release-notes: re-proofreading to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 782404: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782404 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: release-notes: re-proofreading
- From: Justin B Rye <justin.byam.rye@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 17:51:25 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20150411165125.GA14437@xibalba.demon.co.uk>
Package: release-notes Severity: minor Tags: patch Revisions to issues.dbk introduce a couple of phrases that could benefit from extra articles and maybe a change of preposition: For more information about the requirements, please refer to - section called "REQUIREMENTS" in the <ulink + the section called "REQUIREMENTS" in the <ulink url="https://sources.debian.net/src/systemd/jessie/README/">README</ulink> - file of <systemitem role="package">systemd</systemitem> package. + file for the package <systemitem role="package">systemd</systemitem>. (Meanwhile I'm following #780573 and see no problems with the new material there yet.) -- JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular packageIndex: issues.dbk =================================================================== --- issues.dbk (revision 10757) +++ issues.dbk (working copy) @@ -516,9 +516,9 @@ </para> <para> For more information about the requirements, please refer to - section called "REQUIREMENTS" in the <ulink + the section called "REQUIREMENTS" in the <ulink url="https://sources.debian.net/src/systemd/jessie/README/">README</ulink> - file of <systemitem role="package">systemd</systemitem> package. + file for the package <systemitem role="package">systemd</systemitem>. </para> </section>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Justin B Rye <justin.byam.rye@gmail.com>, 782404-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#782404: release-notes: re-proofreading
- From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 08:54:50 +0200
- Message-id: <5530AE3A.3030104@thykier.net>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20150411165125.GA14437@xibalba.demon.co.uk>
- References: <[🔎] 20150411165125.GA14437@xibalba.demon.co.uk>
On 2015-04-11 18:51, Justin B Rye wrote: > Package: release-notes > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > > Revisions to issues.dbk introduce a couple of phrases that could > benefit from extra articles and maybe a change of preposition: > > For more information about the requirements, please refer to > - section called "REQUIREMENTS" in the <ulink > + the section called "REQUIREMENTS" in the <ulink > url="https://sources.debian.net/src/systemd/jessie/README/">README</ulink> > - file of <systemitem role="package">systemd</systemitem> package. > + file for the package <systemitem role="package">systemd</systemitem>. > Thanks, applied. > (Meanwhile I'm following #780573 and see no problems with the new > material there yet.) > Sounds good. :) I just applied the patch in #782695 and I hope I can convince you to review it as well. :) Thanks, ~Niels
--- End Message ---