Re: Request of restoration of the DDP CVS at gluck
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:40:27PM +0000, James Troup wrote:
> Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a <email@example.com> writes:
> > Following the instructions post-compromise, and even if a bit late, the
> > DDP CVS has been checked by different members of the project .
> Does the debian-doc repository have to remain group Debian? We're
> trying to tie down CVS to unprivileged users and groups. If at all
> possible, I'd like to restrict this to a group of committers rather
> than have it open to all 900+ developers. However, if that's what you
> really want...
Attached is a list of the DD that have contributed to the DDP CVS at some
point. Please create a debian-doc group with these and restrict the CVS
with it. Not all of them are active but we can do the filtering later on,
as soon as the CVS is reinstated we will make an announcement with the
current status and how/when the project will be moved to Alioth.
> > [DDP @ alioth.]
> FWIW (and since JFS asked me to comment), I'd prefer the solution
> where only data is alioth, and scripts are either updated by hand or
> (if you must) updated from gluck.
Noted. For the time being we are going to move data from gluck to Alioth
and keep the scripts in gluck's CVS. I understand that the cron job at
klecker will be updating it's contents from gluck's CVS. Correct? Is there
a way for us to supervise that cronjob?