Re: Action plan poll for DDP
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:01:22PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:08:53PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > As I understand (correct me if I am wrong), there are few different
> > opinion on how we run DDP.
> > Please reply to this with your opinion. I will summarize.
> Sorry, I do not understand your questions, so here are random thoughts.
> IMO there is only a single question: do we want docs be moved to
> Alioth or not? If so, let's go for it, and as links to cvs.debian.org
> will have to be updated on web pages and inside those documents,
> renaming directories at the same time is a very good opportunity.
> Makefiles must be included on Alioth as well so that their maintainers
> can build packages. The directory renaming should have no impact here,
> except for ddp/utils/scripts/common.sh.
My understanding was this was implicit yes. Question was how and when.
> How documents will be build on www-master (or gluck, but I believe it is
> on the former) is out of our control, so why should we wait? You
> proposed a quick-and-dirty (no offense in mind ;)) solution with 2 CVS
> checkouts, a cleaner one may be found later. This issue is not related
> to CVS location.
That what I thought. After a second thought, alioth with 2 project and
shared tree may be cleaner solution.