[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DDP restoration plan proposal (medium-term move to Alioth)

On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:17:38PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org> writes:
> > IMHO, DDP is relatively static.  I am thinking more like that I would
> > like take this opportunity to clean up DDP while restoring it.
> >
> > At least consistency of directory names can be gained.
> >
> > Also considering SGML --> XML move in the future, "manuals.sgml" may be
> > better called "manuals".  These are simple change.
> I'm ok with all of this.  This is for restoring on gluck so authors
> can immediately re-start with the updates?

Yes and no.

Immediate is alioth. (Practically done)

gluck requires Debian admin to create directory debian-doc.

Tar balls are there on gluck.

alioth is usable although I need consensus on my choice of directory
name before I can diclare it is up.  (Hmmm... I can move directory later
too.  But I will check this list in few days for the responses)


Reply to: