Re: Licences for documentation

["Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona" <jgb@gsyc.escet.urjc.es>]

	Perhaps you want to consider Open Resources Magazine License
(http://www.openresources.com/magazine/license/index.html)

		Jesus.

Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
 > 
 > I'm trying to make an informed opinion about the best licence for 
 > documentation (not software). There is apparently no Debian policy on that 
 > subject, apart from the fact that DDP documents must be DFSG-free.
 > 
 > Does anyone has a list of pros _and cons_ for:
 > 
 > OpenContent <http://www.opencontent.org/home.shtml> 
 > 
 > GPL <http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html>
 > 
 > Other licences? I noticed the Samba book uses another licence <http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/licenseinfo.html>. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > --  
 > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-request@lists.debian.org
 > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

-- 
Jesus M. Gonzalez Barahona             | Departamento de Informatica
                                       | Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
jgb@computer.org                       | 
Grupo de Sistemas y Comunicaciones     | Mostoles, Spain