Re^8: document registration policy needing to be written
Am 16.04.98 schrieb apharris # burrito.onshore.com ...
Moin Adam!
APH> Did you read the doc-base documention yet, Marco?
No, sorry, I don#t have it.
APH> It is the document ID. Currently, in doc-base (and this affects your
APH> new document standard registration format you proposed) every document
APH> may have one and only one Debian-unique ID. Each document id has a
Could you explain, why we need a document ID?
APH> control file (in /usr/share/doc-base).
That#s not good. Keep packages like doc-linux in mind.
APH> Each document id may have many
APH> formats.
I think we don#t need this ID, we need only a tag to separate two
documents in ony file (like <item>).
APH> Yes, but it is a field that actually makes sense to speakers of
APH> English, unlike "linkname".
Ok, I agree.
APH> Sure. Arguably. Then I could have an index on authors. You could
APH> sort by author.
I#m not sure, this tag should be optional.
APH> What?
Sorry, HTML should be allowed in abstract, right?
APH> I'm not quite sure what's up with these. Christian, can you recount
APH> the justification for these?
Maybe he uses it for a search engine? I think, we should drop it.
APH> It's name is SGML. (Mark my words, MSWord will support XML this
APH> year.)
:). I don#t think so. But who uses Word :). It#s LaTeX time.
cu, Marco
--
Uni: Budde@tu-harburg.de Fido: 2:240/5202.15
Mailbox: mbudde@hqsys.antar.com http://www.tu-harburg.de/~semb2204/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: