Re: DocBook instead of debiandoc-sgml?
On 27 Feb 1998, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
[snip]
> > Ok, does everyone agree that we remove the `policy' statement from the DDP
> > pages that we use debiandoc-sgml? I'd suggest to change this policy aspect
> > to allow DDP authors to use the SGML system of their choice, provided that
> > the SGML system is part of the Debian main system and does not require
> > non-free components for processing the documents.
>
> No, I don't think this is a good idea. If everybody just uses what
> pleases her we would get a mess with all kinds of formats, layouts,
> looks, etc. This is in my opinion definitely not the way to go.
You're right. I guess I shouldn't have given up so soon this time. We had
good reasons for choosing debiandoc-sgml in the past and this hasn't
changed with the availability of docbook. The DDP policy will stay as it
is.
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ schwarz@monet.m.isar.de, schwarz@schwarz-online.com,
! ___; schwarz@debian.org, schwarz@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de
\ /
\\\______/ ! PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
\ / http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
-.-.,---,-,-..---,-,-.,----.-.-
"DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!"
--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to debian-doc-request@lists.debian.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to listmaster@debian.org .
Reply to: