Hello, On Sun 07 Dec 2025 at 01:30pm GMT, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun 07 Dec 2025 at 01:47pm +01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> I agree that the ITS procedure is about taking over responsibility of a >> package, not taking away responsibility of a package: A package is not >> salvaged by moving it from a DD as maintainer to QA as >> pseudo-maintainer - not even if said DD is unresponsive. Use MIA >> process for handling unresponsive DDs, and if that process is flawed >> then let's discuss how to improve the situation - don't abuse other >> processes. >> >> I have previously shared my concerns on this with Andreas in person at >> Debconf. Thanks for moving the discussion here, Tobias. > > I agree. It has been frustrating to watch Andreas abuse the ITS > process. I should have written "misuse" not "abuse", because obviously Andreas's intentions with this are not bad. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature