Hello, On Sun 07 Dec 2025 at 01:47pm +01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I agree that the ITS procedure is about taking over responsibility of a > package, not taking away responsibility of a package: A package is not > salvaged by moving it from a DD as maintainer to QA as > pseudo-maintainer - not even if said DD is unresponsive. Use MIA > process for handling unresponsive DDs, and if that process is flawed > then let's discuss how to improve the situation - don't abuse other > processes. > > I have previously shared my concerns on this with Andreas in person at > Debconf. Thanks for moving the discussion here, Tobias. I agree. It has been frustrating to watch Andreas abuse the ITS process. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature