[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Comments on proposing NEW queue improvement (Re: Current NEW review process saps developer motivation



Hello,

On Sun 28 Aug 2022 at 07:45AM +02, Andreas Tille wrote:

>
> Am Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 09:53:40AM -0400 schrieb M. Zhou:
>> In my fuzzy memory, the last discussion on NEW queue improvement
>> involves the disadvantages by allowing SOVERSION bump to directly
>> pass the NEW queue. I'm not going to trace back, because I know
>> this will not be implemented unless someone proposes a GR.
>
> I'm considering this once beeing back from vac.  However, the problem in
> such a GR is that even if there is an outcome for the voting that sais
> SOVERSION bumps should pass new we need some code that implements this.
> So we also need someone to volunteer for this.

I think we still want the binary package namespace checking?

I.e., a GR just saying "ftpteam should not do a full licensing/copyright
check for packages in binNEW".

Then no software changes are required.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: