[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The future of src:ntp



Richard Laager wrote on 23/01/2022:
> On 1/19/22 15:04, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> On 19.01.22 20:34, Richard Laager wrote:
>>> 2. I create transitional binary packages in src:ntpsec:
> 
> I got to thinking about this more. This won't work, because src:ntp is 
> 1:4.2.8p15+dfsg-1 and src:ntpsec is 1.2.1+dfsg1-2. I would need an epoch 
> (of 2, since ntp already has an epoch of 1) on ntpsec in order for 
> src:ntpsec's transitional bin:ntp package to be newer than src:ntp's 
> bin:ntp package.
> 
> It might be technically possible to build a binary package with 
> different versioning, but even if it is: 1) I don't know how,

One way it can be done is by creating d/changelog files which are
specific to the binary package, e.g.

  debian/ntp.changelog
  debian/ntpdate.changelog (no idea if it can be a symlink)
  ...

with their own version, different from the one in debian/changelog.

Paride


Reply to: