On Jan 18, Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> wrote: > I think Fedora prefers chrony instead of ntpsec. Fedora even uses btrfs, so who cares. :-) The interesting point is that RHEL switched to chrony for RHEL 7. Also, I want to add that chrony is not just better as a client, but also as a NTP server. https://engineering.fb.com/2020/03/18/production-engineering/ntp-service/ offers quite some insights. > If "ntp" the binary package would become a transitional package that > installs chrony, that'd be fine with me if that eases the transition. I am not sure that this would be practical since they cannot share the same configuration. I have no objections if somebody wants to work on packaging ntpsec, but I do not think that either ntp or ntpsec should be promoted over chrony nowadays. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature