Re: The future of src:ntp
Bernhard Schmidt <berni@debian.org> wrote:
> However, development for ntp.org is slow, upstream still using BitKeeper
> is cumbersome, and even the testsuite needs to be fixes on some
> architectures for new releases. Both ntpsec and chrony are (from my POV)
> the better alternatives now. To a point where I would rather use chrony
> for new deployments, but I'm shying away from not using my own work
> anymore for the lack of real-life testing.
Agreed, I think we should simply remove src:ntp at this point. Fedora
migrated existing installs to ntpsec it seems:
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NtpReplacement
Cheers,
Moritz
Reply to: