On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 02:48:49PM -0500, Boyuan Yang wrote: > should be the correct choice. For a specific example, I just spotted > https://bugs.debian.org/961136 the second time (last time back in May 2020); yet the bug was never pinged after it was filed. and so as many bugs it "got lost", despite being there. I wouldn't blame a busy maintainer for that. I'd rather blame myself for not pinging the bug in >18 month despite caring. it's ok to ping bugs without an answer (after a sensible amount of time), and it's ok to ping again and again (again, after sensible time). -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Stop saying that we are all in the same boat. We’re all in the same storm. But we’re not all in the same boat.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature