Re: packages expected to fail on some archs
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 09:25:40PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Paul Gevers, le dim. 11 sept. 2022 21:16:08 +0200, a ecrit:
> >
> > - color packages that "never" had a successful built on an architecture
> > different. That information is already available because that's what marks
> > the package as "uncompiled" vs "out-of-date".
>...
> That doesn't cover the case when a package stopped building on an arch,
> though.
In practive it does, when Paul wrote "never" that actually means
"no older version is in the archive on that architecture".
On release architectures people are usually fast with getting stale
versions of no longer buildable packages removed since it prevents
testing migration.
> Samuel
cu
Adrian
Reply to: