[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: packages expected to fail on some archs

Paul Gevers, le dim. 11 sept. 2022 21:16:08 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 11-09-2022 17:08, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > We could for instance:
> > - Add an Architecture-FTBFS field to debian/control
> > - Add an environment variable to debian/rules so that on these archs dh
> >    fails with a different exit code that buildds would notice.
> > - Add a Architecture-FTBFS field in the wb database that DDs can set
> - color packages that "never" had a successful built on an architecture
> different. That information is already available because that's what marks
> the package as "uncompiled" vs "out-of-date".

Oh, right, that information is already available in wb.  Mehdi, do you
think you can implement that easily for a start?

That doesn't cover the case when a package stopped building on an arch,


Reply to: