Quoting Russ Allbery (2021-10-05 06:57:00) > Kentaro Hayashi <kenhys@xdump.org> writes: > > > What do you think about it? > > > 1. We should use +dfsg-1 style > > 2. We should use +dfsgN-1 style > > 3. We should use +dfsg.N-1 style > > 4. Other > > I would start with +dfsg-1 because it's fairly rare to have to iterate > on the repackaging. You can then switch to +dfsgN-1 with the second > and subsequent repackagings if needed. (Although if I knew in advance > I would probably need to iterate, I'd start with +dfsgN-1.) > > There's an argument for consistency to always use +dfsgN-1, I guess, > but I don't think it matters enough to bother. > > I would not use +dfsg.N-1. It's not consistent with the other places > where we add suffixes, such as backporting and stable updates. Exactly my practice and thinking as well. :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature