Hello, > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Sean Whitton wrote: >> There are arguments both ways here but as you're the person driving >> this, I'm still keen to hear more from you about why debian/unstable is >> to be preferred over debian/sid giving the existing convention >> established by dgit. Thanks. > > I don't have figures about their respective usage and I have no time to > look into collecting such statictics. However I have been convinced by > Simon Mc Vittie's request to document some sort of preference. > > debian/unstable better matches what we put in the changelog: we > put unstable for upload to the development release (and we put a codename > for stable uploads). > > debian/unstable is more expressive than debian/sid for persons who > are not very familiar with the debian release naming scheme. Okay, thanks. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature