On 04.09.20 03:39, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 15:18 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote: > >> For DSA - I'm assuming all role addresses have members behind it with >> debian addresses? "Please don't register on the portal with role >> addresses" would seem a sensible guideline to me. > > I just took a look at the aliases repo and most of them are solely > Debian members but some have folks who are not yet Debian members and > at least one has no Debian members on it. > >> If there is a group missing that it makes sense to add we can look at >> that - let me know. Using the debian.org email as a filter seemed like a >> neat and simple solution when I discussed it with Jonathan originally. >> I'd rather avoid having to manage lists of individual email addresses. >> That's a real pain and IMO will only break in the long term. >> Open to other suggestions if what we have implemented doesn't work but >> it has to be balanced with the amount of effort involved. > > If you are able to regularly automatically load and process a file, > there is one containing a list of Debian Maintainers, including an > email address that they use in their Debian work. IIRC this list is > regularly pruned by Debian when folks stop contributing. Probably > updating your copy of it daily would be regular enough. Why do we need to make this 100% accurate in the first place? Everyone who got access to a debian.org email address has been an OSS contributor of sorts. Which leaves those who opted out of the email address entirely (rather than not using it) - but they are free to reactivate it. It feels like just checking for @debian.org is good enough, IMO. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature