[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]



On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 03:57:29PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > >> I'd contest this. Whenever Open Source standards come up in a
> > > >> discussion, Debian is always the gold reference. You know it can be done
> > > >> right and it is: in Debian.
> > > > Or you can look at the Redhat approach as a minimal working one.
> > > > You know it can be done much easier and still work: in Redhat.
> > > 
> > > (in case it hasn't already been discussed in this thread, but don't
> > > bother rehashing...): What are they doing differently?
> > rpm packages record the package license information in a one-line License:
> > field.
> 
> Is your point that 9 lines can be reduced to one, or that 100 lines can 
> be reduced to one?
I'll repeat my point:

You know it can be done much easier and still work: in Redhat.

> If you are talking about omitting some licensing, then I fail to 
> recognize how that can be a "gold standard" which I believe is what you 
> claimed above.
I'm just saying that there is an approach of providing a gold standard and
there are other approaches.
The project decides what to provide.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: