[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 03:32:20PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> On 25.03.20 15:19, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 03:14:41PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> >> On 25.03.20 14:43, Christian Kastner wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is not to say that licensing is an unimportant issue -- it clearly
> >>> is. But our analyze-and-document down-to-the-file approach is on the
> >>> other extreme end of the spectrum, and it causes lots of tiresome work
> >>> that nobody apart from us seems to care about.
> >>
> >> I'd contest this. Whenever Open Source standards come up in a
> >> discussion, Debian is always the gold reference. You know it can be done
> >> right and it is: in Debian.
> > Or you can look at the Redhat approach as a minimal working one.
> > You know it can be done much easier and still work: in Redhat.
> (in case it hasn't already been discussed in this thread, but don't
> bother rehashing...): What are they doing differently?

Bad: much poorer _technical_ standards.
Good: single-line description of copyright.

⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ in the beginning was the boot and root floppies and they were good.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀                                       -- <willmore> on #linux-sunxi

Reply to: