Re: RFC: Replacing vim-tiny with nano in essential packages
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:06:11AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Debian Ports is affected by this problem in particular because we don't have
> the cruft feature in mini-DAK [3], so every time I build a debian-installer
> image and forget checking whether vim build successfully on every architecture,
> the particular debian-installer image becomes unusable because debootstrap
> cannot install vim-tiny as its version mismatches the version of vim-common.
>
The debian-ports archive maintainers could decide to change vim-tiny's
priority on their side, without imposing that decision on the debian
archive.
Cheers,
Julien
Reply to: