[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: moving mg from salsa to github?



On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 18:26 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 05:02:03PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 14:16 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > > 
> > > I am maintainer for mg, currently on salsa. Problem is, upstream
> > > doesn't release tar balls anymore, but moved the code to github.
> > > No tags.
> > > 
> > > How can I tell Salsa? Should I drop the upstream and pristine-tar
> > > branches on Salsa and integrate the repository on github?
> > 
> > Yes.
> 
> Euh ...
>
> > > Would you suggest to move the debian part to github instead?
> > 
> > I think you should keep the packaging repository on Salsa, because
> > Debian contributors generally have accounts there while some do not
> > want to use (or are not allowed to use) Github.
> 
> I do read that as the above 'Yes.' should be a 'No.'

I'm interpreting "integrate" as "merge from".  If it means moving to
Github, why would the *next* sentence say "move ... to github instead"?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: