[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian With Alternate Init Systems



This thread has served its purpose.
Continuing this thread is neither consistent with our Code of Conduct
nor with the idea of facilitating a productive on-topic discussion
within the scope of the debian-devel mailing list.

Among other reasons, the discussion is starting to repeat itself and to
fail to respect the participants.


>>>>> "Didier" == Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org> writes:

    Didier> Le samedi, 8 février 2020, 16.15:13 h CET Svante Signell a
    Didier> écrit :
    >> On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 14:51 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
    >> > Sam Hartman, le sam. 08 févr. 2020 08:27:24 -0500, a ecrit: > >
    >> It sounds like you were suggesting that people should leave as a
    >> way of > > pressuring or punishing the project.
    >> 
    >> Why not, if the project is heading in the wrong way according to
    >> their conviction. Some people have already left Debian, as a
    >> result of the GR.

    Didier> The Debian project members voted for a project's position
    Didier> statement of the day, that resulted in option B winning
    Didier> [0]. You might dislike this result, but option B is the
    Didier> Debian project's current opinion on Init systems, multiple
    Didier> init systems, and the use of systemd facilities.

    Didier> Now with this Debian's position statement in mind, you can
    Didier> choose to help making (this) Debian better, or you can
    Didier> choose to put your energy in other projects that pursue
    Didier> goals more aligned with yours. That's not pushing you out,
    Didier> that's Debian saying "this is where we're going; are you
    Didier> going along?".

    >> > I'd say do not try to fix it, we've been trying unsuccessfully
    >> within the > Hurd community.
    >> 
    >> Samuel, so you want me to stop working on Hurd? Nice, the first
    >> thing I'll do is to shut down the Debian/GNU Hurd buildd mahler.

    Didier> Threats and emotional blackmail are not welcome in
    Didier> Debian. Please stop.

    Didier> (If you don't feel like maintaining an piece of
    Didier> infrastructure for the Debian project, by all means organize
    Didier> its replacement to free it from your hands. It's clearly
    Didier> your right. But don't use work you do for the project as
    Didier> argumentative lever; that's really not acceptable.)

    Didier>     OdyX

    Didier> [0] https://www.debian.org/vote/2019/vote_002#textb


Reply to: