Re: Heads up: persistent journal has been enabled in systemd
On February 6, 2020 5:22:15 AM UTC, Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> wrote:
>
>
>On February 5, 2020 8:43:43 AM UTC, Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
>wrote:
>>Hi Scott
>>
>>On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 07:44:25AM +0000, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> >> Of course the fact that I can't use all the tools available to
>>> >manipulate text
>>> >> files to follow or analyze logs is problematic. If I'm using
>>> >journalctl, how
>>> >> do I replicate 'tail -f /var/log/mail.loog'?
>>> >
>>> >journalctl -f SYSLOG_IDENTIFIER=2
>>> >
>>> Do syslog facilities really have to be addressed by number rather
>>than name? That seems like a horrible interface.
>>
>>That's because you asked a pretty specific question and you've been
>>told the exact replacement.
>>
>>However, you most likely don't actually want to tail this specific
>>file.
>>It is a solution for a more abstract problem, e.g. "I want to see logs
>>from Postfix". And this question got a different answer.
>
>Yes, it's been demonstrated that what I'm after won't be impossible
>with journalctl, only far more difficult. And yes, I quite frequently
>find myself tailing that specific file because it has exactly the
>information I need. Please don't explain to me what I want like you
>understand it better than I do.
>
>I understand the premise that journalctl offers the promise of better
>interfaces to system logs. I think it's a long way from that now and I
>don't think my uses of system logs are particularly niche.
>
>Scott K
I went back this far in the thread to try to get back before it went off the rails (IMO).
I get that the results of this discussion aren't going to be my preference. Ok. Win some, lose some. I think it's a bad decision for Debian, but it's not my call. Let's move on.
I have one specific request relative to this change that should be pretty easy:
Please include in the bullseye release notes a description of this change and tell users how to restore the buster logging configuration if they prefer it.
Scott K
Reply to: