Re: Salsa CI news
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:33 PM Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob@debian.org> wrote:
> Second, it that binary build, the way it is compiled upstream, would never be
> accepted by ftp-masters due to lack of some sources in Debian "main".
> That's what I called problem with DFSG compliance.
It's worth remembering that Debian infrastructure relied on qmail for
a long time, despite it not being under a DFSG compliant license at
all. We can argue that everything running in Debian infrastructure
/should/ reflect what we ship to users, but the reality is that there
are multiple reasons why it may not and the project as a whole hasn't
concluded that it should be a requirement to do so.
Reply to: