Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa
From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 04:27:33 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20190913022733.GA30622@gaara.hadrons.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 23930.22589.322449.173732@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] tslef0q8oa9.fsf@suchdamage.org> <[🔎] 23927.51367.848949.15475@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] tsl1rwlzp7u.fsf@suchdamage.org> <[🔎] c78eaffdf13d4fe94f61a0f6d199b872e118cbbb.camel@43-1.org> <[🔎] 23930.22589.322449.173732@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 15:37:49 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ansgar writes ("Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa"):
> > (Using dgit to upload packages is sadly incompatible with best
> > practices around packaging.)
> 
> Using dgit to upload packages is best practice.

I'm sorry, but "best practice" according to who? The dgit maintainers?

Thanks,
Guillem

Reply to:

References:
- Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa
  - From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa
  - From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa
  - From: Ansgar <ansgar@debian.org>
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Mozilla Firefox DoH to CloudFlare by default (for US users)?
Next by Date: Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa
Previous by thread: Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa
Next by thread: dgit violating best practices? (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread