Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> writes: > On 2019-06-25 09:31, Philip Hands wrote: >>> Russ Allbery: >>>> It sounds like a whole ton of work to get a useful amount of coverage >>>> (not >>>> to mention bothering upstreams with questionnaires that I suspect >>>> many of >>>> them would find irritating -- I certainly would with my upstream hat >>>> on), >>>> and I'm not clear on the benefit. Do you have some reason to believe >>>> that >>>> this is a common request by users of Debian? If so, could you share >>>> with >>>> us why you believe that? >>> I'm discussing about CRS inspired from Google Play. >> Do Google Play not pay IARC for this? > > App developers are generally forced to self-rate their apps, otherwise > they disappear from the store. Right, but is that not done by filling out a questionnaire that is somehow administered/rated by IARC, which presumably means that they need to be paid for providing that somewhere along the line (or is it all government funded?). Also, IARC claim to keep ratings under review, which presumably also needs to be paid for somehow. I was guessing that they collect subscriptions from the platforms to cover the costs. Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature