Re: Introducting Debian Trends: historical graphs about Debian packaging practices, and "packages smells"
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:35:40PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 04:55:12PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > biococoa (U) does not use Debhelper (no compat level found) (source version: 2.2.2-4)
> > biococoa (U) should switch to dh. Current build system: cdbs (source version: 2.2.2-4)
>
> | % grep cdbs -r biococoa-2.2.2
> | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/rules:include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/gnustep.mk
> | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/rules:include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/gnumakefile.mk
> | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/control:Build-Depends: cdbs,
> | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/changelog: dh_installsystemd instead -> that's a cdbs issue)
> | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/changelog: * debian/control (Build-Depends): Add cdbs and quilt. Drop gnustep-make
This explains the cdbs smelling (and I loved to get rid of this but
this needs to be fixed by gnustep.mk). But in how far is
"no compat level found"
sensible?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: