Hello, On Mon 24 Dec 2018 at 05:37pm -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > I (not speaking for the whole team), have no objection to this patch. > However, it was pointed out to me that virtual packages require policy > updates[1], first starting as a debian-devel discussion. So I'm starting > this now > > The proposed virtual packages are: > > logind: a org.freedesktop.login1 D-Bus API implementation > default-logind: should be provided by the distributions default logind > provider (currently pam-systemd) > > Background: currently libpam-systemd provides two features currently used > by third parties: one is the necessary hooks to start the systemd > implementation of login1. The second is hooking up the systemd --user > service manager. This virtual package attempts to disentangle the two so > that packages that only require logind can use an alternative > implementation. > > Adam/other elogind maintainers, please clarify/improve wording if this was > somehow inaccurate. There seems to be a consensus (and this is not really controversial), to please file a bug against Policy with a patch to the virtual package list for seconding. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature