On 05/25/2018 12:09 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:02:04PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 05/24/2018 08:53 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >>> On Thu, 24 May 2018, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>> None of the other QA tools mail the maintainer without them asking for >>>> it, autopkgtest shouldn't either. >>> >>> With the exception of piuparts, none of them affect testing migration. >> >> What makes autopkgtest such a beautiful and unique snowflake that it >> should be treated differently from piuparts? > > If you have added an autopkgtest to your package, you probably have an > interest on it being run and pass, otherwise why did you bother in the > first place? DDPO, tracker.d.o, and the testing excuses already show the autopkgtest information I'm interested in. Unlike some maintainers I track the state of my packages daily and closely. Kind Regards, Bas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature