Gert Wollny <gw.fossdev@gmail.com> writes: ... > Short version: Use the salsa per-package issue tracker for problems > that come up with the review in NEW. Is there any significant benefit that this brings over having the same interaction in the BTS? I realise that Gitlab is the new shiny thing, but there is a cost to using two issue tracking mechanisms when one would do, and for packages where the maintainer is not actually using salsa, what then? Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature