[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?



W. Martin Borgert wrote...

> I'm not sure, whether missing SysV support is wishlist, minor,
> or normal. I would accept normal, but some maintainers would
> downgrade severity.

In my understanding of "universal" (Debian, operating system, y'know)
the goal should be to run on as many platforms as reasonably possible.
So unless there's good reason against it - like having other
dependencies on systemd - packages should continue to ship init files.

> The best solution (IMHO) would be dropping SysV support in all
> packages and use systemd-to-sysvinit-converter¹ in case of need.

Given the huge amount of bugs in init scripts[1], this seems like a very
good idea.

> I never tried it myself, however.

Ditto :)  Does it support systemd generators to start with?

    Christoph

[1] A while ago I estimated[how?] a quarter of the init scripts around
    does not properly check and wait for the daemon termination in the
    "stop" action, possibly leading to loss of service as in #802040

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: