Hello Jeremy, On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:06:10PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> wrote: > > I am hereby reserving DEP number 15 for my draft DEP, "Reserved > > namespaces for DD-approved non-maintainer changes". > > I think this proposal somewhat contradicts DEP-14. I forgot to include in the draft an explanation for why this is separate to DEP-14. DEP-14's reserved namespaces are meant to be present in every clone of the repository. By contrast, DEP-15 reserves a namespace that should not be present in every clone. That being said, I don't see why it /contradicts/ DEP-14. Perhaps you could explain. > It also feels to me like this proposal is another way of pushing dgit? It doesn't require dgit. I tried to state this as clearly as I could in the text of the DEP. dgit-repos is the suggested implementation, but from the point of view of a DD/DM, it's just a git remote that requires PGP-signed pushes, which is part of upstream git. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature