Re: Too many Recommends (in particular on mail-transport-agent)
Simon McVittie <email@example.com> writes:
> If there is a best set of Recommends for inexperienced users, and a
> best set of Recommends for experienced users who value minimality, then
> we should err in the direction of supporting the inexperienced users,
> precisely because those are the people least likely to be able to use
> package managers to get a particular feature that they want.
Yes, this. Experienced users can also turn off installation of
Recommends, so I think the focus should be on making things work "as
expected" for people who don't want to understand the details.
There's also a huge difference, given this criteria, betweeen wasted disk
space and running daemons. I think the latter is worth trying to track
down; the former seems largely futile to me. All of the disk space gains
you might conceivably get from, say, removing the recommeds on
libmail-sendmail-perl from po-debconf will be dwarfed by minor changes to
the documentation of some other package on your system, or some new
feature in some standard library.
> If some "wasted" disk space on typical systems is the price we pay for a
> feature working on the first attempt, rather than an inexperienced user
> giving up before they can get that feature to work, or simply not
> knowing that the feature is even possible, then that seems a worthwhile
> price to pay.
>>> libgnomeui-0: xscreensaver
>>> * BAD: Gnome users won't run xscreensaver
>> What? The hell they won't.
> This one *is* obsolete though - not xscreensaver, but libgnomeui-0.
> libgnome and libgnomeui were deprecated sometime during the GNOME 2 era,
> and for stretch the GNOME team has finally managed to exclude them from
> a default desktop installation (task-gnome-desktop), but unfortunately
> there are still more than 50 packages using them. The GNOME team would
> be delighted to see that number go down. The libgnome* libraries help
> you to integrate with a desktop from around 10 years ago that we no
> longer ship, and are not part of modern GNOME; their high-level
> functionality has mostly been superseded by code in GLib and GTK+.
Ah, good call. So this one really should be a bug report.
https://bugs.debian.org/864310 -- please feel free to weigh in and correct
me if I got any of the details wrong.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>