[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: nodejs 6.9 in unstable, manual transition, schedule

Jérémy Lal <kapouer@melix.org> writes:

> 2017-01-06 12:53 GMT+01:00 Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>:
>> Jérémy Lal <kapouer@melix.org> writes:
>>> 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>>>> No answer yet, people are busy, and the number of concerned packages
>>>>> is low (a dozen or so), should i just rebuild and upload them myself ?
>>>> The transition freeze was on Nov 5.
>>> This is not very smart - i'm talking about something that will make future
>>> maintenance and security patches easier, something that is easy to do
>>> and that i can even do alone.
>> Your "This is not very smart" comment made me react fairly negatively at
>> first reading.  It's easy to assume bad things about the old version's
>> stability reading that, although that's presumably not what you were
>> saying.
> I'm asking you to forgive me about that wording, it was driven by my
> disappointment,
> and the reason the package is in this situation is mainly my own fault
> and lack of time.

Nothing to forgive from my point of view -- you just happened not to be
making your case very persuasively.

Feel free to tell us all how there's no problem rebuilding/testing the
thousand-odd node-* packages, or that they don't need rebuilding or
testing, or whatever the case might be, such that people might be moved
to agree with you.

Cheers, Phil.
|)|  Philip Hands  [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]  HANDS.COM Ltd.
|-|  http://www.hands.com/    http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
|(|  Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34,   21075 Hamburg,    GERMANY

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: