Adam Borowski <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Oi you lot!
I don't know a simple term in English that carries that meaning.
> I wonder, would it be better if we switched to using the word
> "depender" in place of "reverse dependency"?
To me, “depender” feel like a neologism and does not make me confident
the reader would know what is meant. I vote −1 to that term.