[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: arch all package's missing dependency on i386 prevents testing migration



On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:42:53 +0200
Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@debian.org> wrote:

> Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org> writes:
> > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 21:25:26 -0700
> > Afif Elghraoui <afif@ghraoui.name> wrote:  
> >> The package in question, circlator, depends on two
> >> architecture-dependent packages that can only build on amd64 and
> >> kfreebsd-amd64 currently. The package cannot migrate to testing
> >> because those dependencies are not available for i386 [1].
> >>
> >> I am hoping there is a better solution to this problem than to work
> >> around this by changing this package's build architecture from
> >> "all" to "any-amd64"  
> >
> > That's not a workaround, it is the correct fix for the error in the
> > original upload. The package cannot work on all architectures - the
> > fact that this is because of dependencies rather than the code
> > within the package is irrelevant. Unless the code in the package can
> > *transparently* omit the need for the dependency on architectures
> > where that dependency does not exist, then the package is not
> > arch:all. Installation alone is insufficient, the package needs to
> > be usable on all the architectures in the Architecture list.  
> 
> No.  It is arch:all if it contains no arch-specific binaries and
> doesn't require arch-specific dependencies (i.e. dependencies which
> should only appear on specific architectures like "foo [amd64]").

True - I got mixed up with that bit. Sorry for the confusion.
 
> It should be fine if an arch:all package depends on binary packages
> that are not installable on all architectures.  Otherwise a lot of
> arch:all packages that depend on, say, linux-specific binary packages
> would become arch:any which is not very useful.
> 
> As far as I remember, the testing migration script checks
> installability of arch:all packages on amd64 and i386, and there are
> manual workarounds for arch:all packages that are not installable on
> these architectures. Cc'ed the release team to take a look too.
> 
> Ansgar
> 


-- 


Neil Williams
=============
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

Attachment: pgpynkfwnGFIn.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: