Re: unattended-upgrades by default?
On December 27, 2016 1:26:24 PM EST, Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> wrote:
>Ian Jackson, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 23:45:37 +0000, wrote:
>> Samuel Thibault writes ("Re: unattended-upgrades by default?"):
>> > SZALAY Attila, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 20:54:26 +0100, wrote:
>> > > If we replace postgresql with postfix, that is much more closer
>to the
>> > > standard. And I guess, that postgresql is just a "misspelling".
>> >
>> > Ew. Yes, sure :)
>>
>> Oh! Well, reading it again then, I think this is a bug (quite a
>> serious bug, since it leads to incorrect bouncing of mail) in the
>> postfix/mysql integration.
>
>FTR, it's #739636.
>
Postfix has no way to know it's temporary, so I think a temporary error would be wrong.
Better to have postfix notice that a map type has been pulled out from under it and stop (what you have to do by hand now).
Scott K
Reply to: